- #Intel it x 980 with 24gb ram with nvidia gtx 680 1080p#
- #Intel it x 980 with 24gb ram with nvidia gtx 680 Pc#
This wasn't because my card couldn't handle it, no card could handle it and even today's card can't, not at max settings.Īt this point people shouldn't order and wait for AMD's benchmarks, I hope they are as promising as they make it seem. "Not being able to play" is a big overstatement, when I bought the 980TI at release date 5 years ago I had to turn down settings on unoptimized games. If you follow gaming trends we won't reach 10GB's 1440p for some years to come, by which time one could consider upgrading again.ĭLSS also turns down the amount of VRAM used by quite a bit and we don't know how many titles will adopt this technology (AMD is also working on a similar thing)
Upcoming games like watchdogs Legion don't get to 10GB's on 4K, let alone 1440p The only game that currently reaches 10GB's is Crysis remastered however since at max settings the 3080 can't even reach 60FPS this isn't a realistic scenario The fact is most games don't even reach 8GB's let alone 10GB's for 1440 For 1440p Quad HD, we were able to play Valorant at 96 fps to 96 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 96 fps.įor 2160p 4K, we were able to play Valorant at 84 fps to 84 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 84 fps.(which will definitly be the case with 10GB) than not being able to play poor optimised games due tu a small vram pool.įacts are the only thing that really matter.
#Intel it x 980 with 24gb ram with nvidia gtx 680 1080p#
Even if the GTX 970 consistently delivers frame rate increases over the GTX 770, the gain is not much to justify an upgrade.įor 1080p Full HD, we were able to play Battlefield V, Fallout 76, World War Z, Apex Legends, Forza Horizon 4 at 60 fps to 63 fps and kept frame rates hovering around 62 fps. Unfortunately, gaming performance was not quite as impressive. In our synthetic benchmarks, the GTX 970 blows past the GTX 770 and, amazingly, even the GTX 780 as well. The GTX 970 has 4 GB RAM compared to the GTX 770 's 2 GB video memory. Meanwhile, the AMD closest equivalent card is the R9 290X which costs $ 549. Compare this to the GTX 770, which came originally at a price of $ 399.
The GTX 970 is much more cheaper than the GTX 770 as it costs $ 329. After taking the time to fully test the Maxwell 2.0 graphics card inside the GTX 970, we can say without a doubt that it continues the trend. NVIDIA ’s xx70 cards have always been defined by mid-range prices with performance that knocks on the door of high-end graphics cards – especially when overclocked. On the other hand, the GTX 970 is closer to being reasonably affordable at a price tag of $ 329.
#Intel it x 980 with 24gb ram with nvidia gtx 680 Pc#
The GTX 980 might be the high-end flagship of the latest Maxwell 2.0 set of graphics cards, but their prices keep them out of the reach of most mid-range PC gamers. The overall score is determined based on the calculated weightings for the individual components. The higher the better for higher resolution textures and future The higher the better.Ĭurrent CPU Impact on performance with respect to the highest performing CPU used for benchmark at the The higher the better.ĤK performance at 2160p resolution. The lower the better.įull HD performance at 1080p resolution. The lower the better for longer life of the graphics card. Power Supply Wattage required for overall system. The newer the better technology and performance optimization and
0 kommentar(er)
